How Many Doctors Will Tell About The Incompetence Of Colleagues.
A jumbo view of American doctors has found that more than one-third would waver to turn in a ally they thought was incompetent or compromised by substance abuse or mental salubriousness problems. However, most physicians agreed in principle that those in charge should be told about "bad" physicians. As it stands, said Catherine M DesRoches, helpmeet professor at the Mongan Institute for Health Policy at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston, "self-regulation is our best alternative, but these findings suggest that we at bottom miss to invigorate that cost of penile enlargement surgery in catalГЈo. We don't have a commendable alternative system".
DesRoches is bring on author of the study, which appears in the July 14 stem of the Journal of the American Medical Association. The American Medical Association (AMA) and other master medical organizations hold that "physicians have an righteous obligation to report" impaired colleagues. Several states also have compulsory reporting laws, according to background information in the article.
To assess how the in the air system of self-regulation is doing, these researchers surveyed almost 1900 anesthesiologists, cardiologists, pediatricians, psychiatrists and progenitors medicine, combined surgery and internal medicine doctors. Physicians were asked if, within the recent three years, they had had "direct, particular knowledge of a physician who was impaired or incompetent to practice medicine" and if they had reported that colleague.
Of 17 percent of doctors who had lineal conception of an incompetent colleague, only two-thirds actually reported the problem, the assess found. This despite the fact that 64 percent of all respondents agreed that physicians should announcement impaired colleagues. Almost 70 percent of physicians felt they were "prepared" to boom such a problem, the work authors noted.
Showing posts with label doctors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label doctors. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 10, 2019
Monday, December 24, 2018
Choice Of Place Of Death From Cancer
Choice Of Place Of Death From Cancer.
Doctors who would determine hospice charge for themselves if they were dying from cancer are more apposite to discuss such care with patients in that situation, a altered study finds in Dec 2013. And while the majority of doctors in the inquiry said they would seek hospice care if they were dying from cancer, less than one-third of those said they would debate hospice care with terminally critically cancer patients at an early stage of care. Researchers surveyed nearly 4400 doctors who keeping for cancer patients, including elemental care physicians, surgeons, oncologists, emission oncologists and other specialists phenibut. They were asked if they would want hospice care if they were terminally untoward with cancer.
They were also asked when they would discuss hospice care with a philosophical with terminal cancer who had four to six months to glowing but had no symptoms: immediately; when symptoms first appear; when there are no more cancer remedying options; when the patient is admitted to hospital; or when the patient or family asks about hospice care. In terms of seeking hospice misery themselves, 65 percent of doctors were strongly in favor and 21 percent were a little in favor.
Doctors who would determine hospice charge for themselves if they were dying from cancer are more apposite to discuss such care with patients in that situation, a altered study finds in Dec 2013. And while the majority of doctors in the inquiry said they would seek hospice care if they were dying from cancer, less than one-third of those said they would debate hospice care with terminally critically cancer patients at an early stage of care. Researchers surveyed nearly 4400 doctors who keeping for cancer patients, including elemental care physicians, surgeons, oncologists, emission oncologists and other specialists phenibut. They were asked if they would want hospice care if they were terminally untoward with cancer.
They were also asked when they would discuss hospice care with a philosophical with terminal cancer who had four to six months to glowing but had no symptoms: immediately; when symptoms first appear; when there are no more cancer remedying options; when the patient is admitted to hospital; or when the patient or family asks about hospice care. In terms of seeking hospice misery themselves, 65 percent of doctors were strongly in favor and 21 percent were a little in favor.
Saturday, November 24, 2018
Americans Suffer High Blood Pressure
Americans Suffer High Blood Pressure.
High blood require is a preventable and treatable imperil factor for nature attack and stroke, but about one-quarter of adults don't be sure they have it, according to a large new study. Among those who do know they have the condition, many are not in all probability to have it under control, said lead researcher Dr Uchechukwu Sampson, a cardiologist at Vanderbilt University Medical School in Nashville reduce breast size by losing weight. "Despite all the broaden we have made in having on tap curing options, more than half of the people we studied still have uncontrolled high blood pressure.
The analyse is published in the January issue of the roll Circulation: Cardiovascular and Quality Outcomes. One in three US adults has acme blood pressure, according to the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Any reading over 140/90 millimeters of mercury is considered heinous blood pressure. The bookwork findings coincided with the Dec 18, 2013 issuing of unusual guidelines for blood strength management by experts from the institute's eighth Joint National Committee.
Among other changes, the unheard of guidelines promote that fewer people take blood urging medicine. Older adults, under the new guidelines, wouldn't be treated until their blood intimidation topped 150/90, instead of 140/90. In Sampson's study, the researchers evaluated how stale anticyclone blood pressure was in more than 69000 men and women. Overall, 57 percent self-reported that they had exalted blood pressure.
High blood require is a preventable and treatable imperil factor for nature attack and stroke, but about one-quarter of adults don't be sure they have it, according to a large new study. Among those who do know they have the condition, many are not in all probability to have it under control, said lead researcher Dr Uchechukwu Sampson, a cardiologist at Vanderbilt University Medical School in Nashville reduce breast size by losing weight. "Despite all the broaden we have made in having on tap curing options, more than half of the people we studied still have uncontrolled high blood pressure.
The analyse is published in the January issue of the roll Circulation: Cardiovascular and Quality Outcomes. One in three US adults has acme blood pressure, according to the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Any reading over 140/90 millimeters of mercury is considered heinous blood pressure. The bookwork findings coincided with the Dec 18, 2013 issuing of unusual guidelines for blood strength management by experts from the institute's eighth Joint National Committee.
Among other changes, the unheard of guidelines promote that fewer people take blood urging medicine. Older adults, under the new guidelines, wouldn't be treated until their blood intimidation topped 150/90, instead of 140/90. In Sampson's study, the researchers evaluated how stale anticyclone blood pressure was in more than 69000 men and women. Overall, 57 percent self-reported that they had exalted blood pressure.
Labels:
among,
blood,
doctors,
guidelines,
pressure,
researchers
Wednesday, July 18, 2018
Teens Need Regularly Make Medical Examination
Teens Need Regularly Make Medical Examination.
Doctors often disdain to have a conversation with their teen patients about sexuality issues during their annual physical, a altered study reveals. This results in missed opportunities to notify and counsel young ancestors about ways to help prevent sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted teen pregnancies, the researchers suggested breastpenis.club. The study, published Dec 30, 2013 in JAMA Pediatrics, complicated 253 teens and 49 doctors from 11 clinics from the Raleigh/Durham, North Carolina area.
One-third of these teens did not petition questions about congress or talk over their lustful activity, sexuality, dating or procreative identity during their yearly check-ups, the study found. The researchers, led by Stewart Alexander of the Duke University Medical Center, recorded conversations between the teens and their doctor, and analyzed how much while was fini talking about sex. They also considered the involvement of teens in these discussions.
Doctors often disdain to have a conversation with their teen patients about sexuality issues during their annual physical, a altered study reveals. This results in missed opportunities to notify and counsel young ancestors about ways to help prevent sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted teen pregnancies, the researchers suggested breastpenis.club. The study, published Dec 30, 2013 in JAMA Pediatrics, complicated 253 teens and 49 doctors from 11 clinics from the Raleigh/Durham, North Carolina area.
One-third of these teens did not petition questions about congress or talk over their lustful activity, sexuality, dating or procreative identity during their yearly check-ups, the study found. The researchers, led by Stewart Alexander of the Duke University Medical Center, recorded conversations between the teens and their doctor, and analyzed how much while was fini talking about sex. They also considered the involvement of teens in these discussions.
Tuesday, July 17, 2018
Mortality From Lung Cancer Is Several Times Higher Than From Cancer Of Other Organs
Mortality From Lung Cancer Is Several Times Higher Than From Cancer Of Other Organs.
Lung cancer is the most wearying fettle of cancer in the United States, homicide about 157,300 plebeians every year - more than colon, knocker and prostate cancer combined, according to the US National Institutes of Health. It is also the nation's encourage influential cause of death, second only to heart disease. And yet lung cancer attracts fewer federal fact-finding dollars per decease than the other leading forms of cancer demise pills for penis enlargement in maryville. Doctors have yet to come across a reliable method for screening for lung cancer.
And new treatments for lung cancer record out at a snail's pace compared with therapies for other cancers. So why does the cap cancer killer entice so little attention? Largely because people are perceived to have done this to themselves, garnering petty public sympathy, said Kay Cofrancesco, executive of advocacy relations for the Lung Cancer Alliance, a resident nonprofit group dedicated to lung cancer support and advocacy. About 90 percent of men and 80 percent of women who end from lung cancer are progress or former smokers, according to NIH.
And "In demonizing the tobacco companies, we've then demonized the smoker. So there is that blame-the-victim acuity when it comes to lung cancer patients". Yet some advances are being made. Clinical trials are being conducted on one capacity screening puppet for lung cancer.
Targeted therapies are being developed based on the genetics of lung cancer. But certainly more can be done, experts say. Survival rates for lung cancer are bleak compared with other cancers, mostly because lung cancer is most often not detected until it has metastasized.
And "Some lung cancers have a propensity to paste a great extent throughout the body," said Dr Len Lichtenfeld, surrogate chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society. "By the convenience they have symptoms, the cancer has spread". Because smoking is so closely linked to lung cancer, most bills aimed at bar has gone into programs to promote smoking cessation.
These programs have not made a lot of headway. Between 1998 and 2008, the interest of US residents who currently smoked declined just 3,5 percent, from 24,1 to 20,6 percent, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Even as some bodies quit, it is possible that encouraged by rigorous smoke-free laws and blatant anti-smoking campaigns, others take possession of up the habit. Quitting smoking does provide numerous health benefits - improved lung office and decreased blood tension among them - but former smokers will always have an elevated imperil for developing lung cancer.
Lung cancer is the most wearying fettle of cancer in the United States, homicide about 157,300 plebeians every year - more than colon, knocker and prostate cancer combined, according to the US National Institutes of Health. It is also the nation's encourage influential cause of death, second only to heart disease. And yet lung cancer attracts fewer federal fact-finding dollars per decease than the other leading forms of cancer demise pills for penis enlargement in maryville. Doctors have yet to come across a reliable method for screening for lung cancer.
And new treatments for lung cancer record out at a snail's pace compared with therapies for other cancers. So why does the cap cancer killer entice so little attention? Largely because people are perceived to have done this to themselves, garnering petty public sympathy, said Kay Cofrancesco, executive of advocacy relations for the Lung Cancer Alliance, a resident nonprofit group dedicated to lung cancer support and advocacy. About 90 percent of men and 80 percent of women who end from lung cancer are progress or former smokers, according to NIH.
And "In demonizing the tobacco companies, we've then demonized the smoker. So there is that blame-the-victim acuity when it comes to lung cancer patients". Yet some advances are being made. Clinical trials are being conducted on one capacity screening puppet for lung cancer.
Targeted therapies are being developed based on the genetics of lung cancer. But certainly more can be done, experts say. Survival rates for lung cancer are bleak compared with other cancers, mostly because lung cancer is most often not detected until it has metastasized.
And "Some lung cancers have a propensity to paste a great extent throughout the body," said Dr Len Lichtenfeld, surrogate chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society. "By the convenience they have symptoms, the cancer has spread". Because smoking is so closely linked to lung cancer, most bills aimed at bar has gone into programs to promote smoking cessation.
These programs have not made a lot of headway. Between 1998 and 2008, the interest of US residents who currently smoked declined just 3,5 percent, from 24,1 to 20,6 percent, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Even as some bodies quit, it is possible that encouraged by rigorous smoke-free laws and blatant anti-smoking campaigns, others take possession of up the habit. Quitting smoking does provide numerous health benefits - improved lung office and decreased blood tension among them - but former smokers will always have an elevated imperil for developing lung cancer.
Wednesday, January 3, 2018
Doctors Strongly Recommend That All Pregnant Women To Have A Blood Test For HIV
Doctors Strongly Recommend That All Pregnant Women To Have A Blood Test For HIV.
A newborn born two-and-a-half years ago in Mississippi with HIV is the original occasion of a self-styled "functional cure" of the infection, researchers announced Sunday. Standard tests can no longer locate any traces of the AIDS-causing virus even though the lady has discontinued HIV medication. "We put faith this is the first well-documented casket of a functional cure," said study lead author Dr Deborah Persaud, associate professor of pediatrics in the part of infectious diseases at Johns Hopkins Children's Center in Baltimore xfinity socorro nm. The decree was presented Sunday at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, in Atlanta.
The neonate was not part of a study but, instead, the beneficiary of an unexpected and partly unplanned string of events that - once confirmed and replicated in a fixed study - might supporter more children who are born with HIV or who at risk of contracting HIV from their coddle eradicate the virus from their body. Normally, mothers infected with HIV put into effect antiretroviral drugs that can almost eliminate the odds of the virus being transferred to the baby. If a parent doesn't comprehend her HIV status or hasn't been treated for other reasons, the baby is given "prophylactic" drugs at emergence while awaiting the results of tests to determine his or her HIV status.
This can draw four to six weeks to complete. If the tests are positive, the spoil starts HIV sedative treatment. The mother of the baby born in Mississippi didn't recognize she was HIV-positive until the time of delivery.
But in this case, both the inaugural and confirmatory tests on the baby were able to be completed within one day, allowing the infant to be started on HIV drug treatment within the first 30 hours of life. "Most of our kids don't get picked up that early". As expected, the baby's "viral load" - detectable levels of HIV - decreased progressively until it was no longer detectable at 29 days of age.
Theoretically, this toddler (doctors aren't disclosing the gender) would have bewitched the medications for the idle about of his or her life, said the researchers, who included doctors from the University of Massachusetts Medical School and the University of Mississippi Medical Center. Instead, the progeny stayed on the regimen for only 18 months before dropping out of the medical scheme and discontinuing the drugs.
Ten months after stopping treatment, however, the kid was again seen by doctors who were surprised to come on no HIV virus or HIV antibodies with law tests. Ultrasensitive tests did read infinitesimal traces of viral DNA and RNA in the blood. But the virus was not replicating - a extremely freakish existence given that drugs were no longer being administered, the researchers said.
A newborn born two-and-a-half years ago in Mississippi with HIV is the original occasion of a self-styled "functional cure" of the infection, researchers announced Sunday. Standard tests can no longer locate any traces of the AIDS-causing virus even though the lady has discontinued HIV medication. "We put faith this is the first well-documented casket of a functional cure," said study lead author Dr Deborah Persaud, associate professor of pediatrics in the part of infectious diseases at Johns Hopkins Children's Center in Baltimore xfinity socorro nm. The decree was presented Sunday at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, in Atlanta.
The neonate was not part of a study but, instead, the beneficiary of an unexpected and partly unplanned string of events that - once confirmed and replicated in a fixed study - might supporter more children who are born with HIV or who at risk of contracting HIV from their coddle eradicate the virus from their body. Normally, mothers infected with HIV put into effect antiretroviral drugs that can almost eliminate the odds of the virus being transferred to the baby. If a parent doesn't comprehend her HIV status or hasn't been treated for other reasons, the baby is given "prophylactic" drugs at emergence while awaiting the results of tests to determine his or her HIV status.
This can draw four to six weeks to complete. If the tests are positive, the spoil starts HIV sedative treatment. The mother of the baby born in Mississippi didn't recognize she was HIV-positive until the time of delivery.
But in this case, both the inaugural and confirmatory tests on the baby were able to be completed within one day, allowing the infant to be started on HIV drug treatment within the first 30 hours of life. "Most of our kids don't get picked up that early". As expected, the baby's "viral load" - detectable levels of HIV - decreased progressively until it was no longer detectable at 29 days of age.
Theoretically, this toddler (doctors aren't disclosing the gender) would have bewitched the medications for the idle about of his or her life, said the researchers, who included doctors from the University of Massachusetts Medical School and the University of Mississippi Medical Center. Instead, the progeny stayed on the regimen for only 18 months before dropping out of the medical scheme and discontinuing the drugs.
Ten months after stopping treatment, however, the kid was again seen by doctors who were surprised to come on no HIV virus or HIV antibodies with law tests. Ultrasensitive tests did read infinitesimal traces of viral DNA and RNA in the blood. But the virus was not replicating - a extremely freakish existence given that drugs were no longer being administered, the researchers said.
Saturday, March 18, 2017
Using Non-Recommended Drugs For The Treatment Of Diabetes
Using Non-Recommended Drugs For The Treatment Of Diabetes.
Using the disputatious diabetes medicate Avandia as an example, restored research finds that doctors' prescribing patterns shift across the country in response to warnings about medications from the US Food and Drug Administration. The sequel is that patients may be exposed to abundant levels of risk depending on where they live, the researchers said vimax. "We were looking at the crashing black-box warnings for drugs have at a citizen level, and, more specifically, at a geographical level, and how these warnings are incorporated into practice," said scrutinize leadership researcher Nilay D Shah, an assistant professor of well-being services research at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn.
In 2007, the FDA required that Avandia come with a "black-box warning" - the strongest forewarning practical - alerting consumers that the soporific was associated with an increased risk of heart attack. Before the warning, Avandia was largely prescribed throughout the United States, although regional differences existed. "There was about a two-fold contradistinction in use before the warning - around 15,5 percent use in Oklahoma versus about 8 percent in North Dakota".
Right after the warning, the use of Avandia dropped dramatically, from a nationwide heinous of 1,3 million monthly prescriptions in January 2007 to nearly 317000 monthly prescriptions in June 2009. "There was a whopping wane in use across the country. But there was positively a suggestion of residual use".
After the FDA warning, the researchers still found as much as a three-fold modification in use across the nation. In Oklahoma, Avandia use dropped to about 5,6 percent, but in North Dakota it tumbled to 1,9 percent. The reasons for the differences aren't clear. Some factors might embrace how doctors are made wise of FDA warnings and how they react.
Another constituent could be the conduct of state health cover plans, including Medicaid, in terms of covering drugs. Also, noted doctors in given areas can influence the choice of drugs other doctors make. And drug-company marketing may depict a role. "At this aim we don't have good insight into these differences".
Using the disputatious diabetes medicate Avandia as an example, restored research finds that doctors' prescribing patterns shift across the country in response to warnings about medications from the US Food and Drug Administration. The sequel is that patients may be exposed to abundant levels of risk depending on where they live, the researchers said vimax. "We were looking at the crashing black-box warnings for drugs have at a citizen level, and, more specifically, at a geographical level, and how these warnings are incorporated into practice," said scrutinize leadership researcher Nilay D Shah, an assistant professor of well-being services research at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn.
In 2007, the FDA required that Avandia come with a "black-box warning" - the strongest forewarning practical - alerting consumers that the soporific was associated with an increased risk of heart attack. Before the warning, Avandia was largely prescribed throughout the United States, although regional differences existed. "There was about a two-fold contradistinction in use before the warning - around 15,5 percent use in Oklahoma versus about 8 percent in North Dakota".
Right after the warning, the use of Avandia dropped dramatically, from a nationwide heinous of 1,3 million monthly prescriptions in January 2007 to nearly 317000 monthly prescriptions in June 2009. "There was a whopping wane in use across the country. But there was positively a suggestion of residual use".
After the FDA warning, the researchers still found as much as a three-fold modification in use across the nation. In Oklahoma, Avandia use dropped to about 5,6 percent, but in North Dakota it tumbled to 1,9 percent. The reasons for the differences aren't clear. Some factors might embrace how doctors are made wise of FDA warnings and how they react.
Another constituent could be the conduct of state health cover plans, including Medicaid, in terms of covering drugs. Also, noted doctors in given areas can influence the choice of drugs other doctors make. And drug-company marketing may depict a role. "At this aim we don't have good insight into these differences".
Monday, December 7, 2015
Painkillers Are One Of The Causes Of Death
Painkillers Are One Of The Causes Of Death.
Abuse of stuporific painkillers and other direction drugs is a growing pickle in the United States, and a leading doctors' set is urging members to exercise tighter control on the medications. The American College of Physicians (ACP) says its recommended changes will amount to it tougher for medicament drugs - painkillers such as Oxycontin and Vicodin, as well as drugs second-hand for sleep problems and importance loss - to be abused or diverted for sale on the street boobs agr d e ho jaye to ky kre kuch tips. Prescription treatment abuse may now be a prime cause of accidental extermination in the United States, according to a recent tally of preliminary data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
One 2010 survey, funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, found that 16 million Americans superannuated 12 and older had cast-off a medication painkiller, sedative, tranquilizer or prod for purposes other than their medical care at least once in the latest year. One of the ACP's 10 recommendations highlighted the lack to educate doctors, patients and the public about the dangers of drug drug abuse. The guidelines also suggested that doctors estimate the full range of available treatments before prescribing painkillers. Among the other recommendations.
Evidence-based, nonbinding guidelines should be developed to serve lead doctors' treatment decisions. A national prescription-drug-monitoring program should be created, so doctors and pharmacists can discontinuance nearly the same programs in their own and neighboring states before writing and filling prescriptions for substances with considerable abuse potential. Two experts said the ACP recommendations are welcome, but more must be done.
Abuse of stuporific painkillers and other direction drugs is a growing pickle in the United States, and a leading doctors' set is urging members to exercise tighter control on the medications. The American College of Physicians (ACP) says its recommended changes will amount to it tougher for medicament drugs - painkillers such as Oxycontin and Vicodin, as well as drugs second-hand for sleep problems and importance loss - to be abused or diverted for sale on the street boobs agr d e ho jaye to ky kre kuch tips. Prescription treatment abuse may now be a prime cause of accidental extermination in the United States, according to a recent tally of preliminary data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
One 2010 survey, funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, found that 16 million Americans superannuated 12 and older had cast-off a medication painkiller, sedative, tranquilizer or prod for purposes other than their medical care at least once in the latest year. One of the ACP's 10 recommendations highlighted the lack to educate doctors, patients and the public about the dangers of drug drug abuse. The guidelines also suggested that doctors estimate the full range of available treatments before prescribing painkillers. Among the other recommendations.
Evidence-based, nonbinding guidelines should be developed to serve lead doctors' treatment decisions. A national prescription-drug-monitoring program should be created, so doctors and pharmacists can discontinuance nearly the same programs in their own and neighboring states before writing and filling prescriptions for substances with considerable abuse potential. Two experts said the ACP recommendations are welcome, but more must be done.
Saturday, May 17, 2014
Americans With Excess Weight Trust Doctors Too With Excess Weight More
Americans With Excess Weight Trust Doctors Too With Excess Weight More.
Overweight and corpulent patients espouse getting opinion on weight loss from doctors who are also overweight or obese, a young study shows June 2013. "In general, heavier patients make their doctors, but they more strongly keeping dietary advice from overweight doctors," said ponder leader Sara Bleich, an associate professor of healthfulness policy and management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, in Baltimore best vito. The check in is published online in the June printing of the journal Preventive Medicine.
Bleich and her team surveyed 600 overweight and abdominous patients in April 2012. Patients reported their acme and weight, and described their primary solicitude doctor as normal weight, overweight or obese. About 69 percent of of age Americans are overweight or obese, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The patients - about half of whom were between 40 and 64 years out of date - rated the wreck of overall reliance they had in their doctors on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being the highest. They also rated their depend in their doctors' diet advice on the same scale, and reported whether they felt judged by their falsify about their weight. Patients all reported a extent high trust level, regardless of their doctors' weight.
Normal-weight doctors averaged a condition of 8,6, overweight 8,3 and paunchy 8,2. When it came to trusting diet advice, however, the doctors' load status mattered. Although 77 percent of those considering a normal-weight doctor trusted the diet advice, 87 percent of those light of an overweight doctor trusted the advice, as did 82 percent of those inasmuch as an obese doctor.
Patients, however, were more than twice as apposite to feel judged about their weight issues when their practise medicine was obese compared to normal weight: 32 percent of those who platitude an obese doctor said they felt judged, while just 17 percent of those who proverb an overweight doctor and 14 percent of those conjunctio in view of a normal-weight doctor felt judged. Bleich's findings follow a circulate published last month in which researchers found that obese patients often "doctor shop" because, they said, they were made to sense uncomfortable about their slant during office visits.
Overweight and corpulent patients espouse getting opinion on weight loss from doctors who are also overweight or obese, a young study shows June 2013. "In general, heavier patients make their doctors, but they more strongly keeping dietary advice from overweight doctors," said ponder leader Sara Bleich, an associate professor of healthfulness policy and management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, in Baltimore best vito. The check in is published online in the June printing of the journal Preventive Medicine.
Bleich and her team surveyed 600 overweight and abdominous patients in April 2012. Patients reported their acme and weight, and described their primary solicitude doctor as normal weight, overweight or obese. About 69 percent of of age Americans are overweight or obese, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The patients - about half of whom were between 40 and 64 years out of date - rated the wreck of overall reliance they had in their doctors on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being the highest. They also rated their depend in their doctors' diet advice on the same scale, and reported whether they felt judged by their falsify about their weight. Patients all reported a extent high trust level, regardless of their doctors' weight.
Normal-weight doctors averaged a condition of 8,6, overweight 8,3 and paunchy 8,2. When it came to trusting diet advice, however, the doctors' load status mattered. Although 77 percent of those considering a normal-weight doctor trusted the diet advice, 87 percent of those light of an overweight doctor trusted the advice, as did 82 percent of those inasmuch as an obese doctor.
Patients, however, were more than twice as apposite to feel judged about their weight issues when their practise medicine was obese compared to normal weight: 32 percent of those who platitude an obese doctor said they felt judged, while just 17 percent of those who proverb an overweight doctor and 14 percent of those conjunctio in view of a normal-weight doctor felt judged. Bleich's findings follow a circulate published last month in which researchers found that obese patients often "doctor shop" because, they said, they were made to sense uncomfortable about their slant during office visits.
Saturday, February 15, 2014
Family Doctors Will Keep Electronic Medical Records
Family Doctors Will Keep Electronic Medical Records.
More than two-thirds of kin doctors now use electronic well-being records, and the cut doing so doubled between 2005 and 2011, a young study finds. If the trend continues, 80 percent of one's own flesh and blood doctors - the largest group of primary concern physicians - will be using electronic records by 2013, the researchers predicted hoodiagordonii. The findings contribute "some encouragement that we have passed a depreciative threshold," said study author Dr Andrew Bazemore, superintendent of the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Primary Care, in Washington, DC "The significant preponderance of earliest care practitioners appear to be using digital medical records in some description or fashion".
The promises of electronic record-keeping include improved medical attention and long-term savings. However, many doctors were loth to adopt these records because of the high cost and the complexity of converting newspaper files. There were also privacy concerns. "We are not there yet," Bazemore added. "More employ is needed, including better message from all of the states".
The Obama administration has offered incentives to doctors who accept electronic health records, and penalties to those who do not. For the study, researchers mined two native data sets to survive how many family doctors were using electronic health records, how this platoon changed over time, and how it compared to use by specialists. Their findings appear in the January-February conclusion of the Annals of Family Medicine.
Nationally, 68 percent of household doctors were using electronic health records in 2011, they found. Rates heterogeneous by state, with a low of about 47 percent in North Dakota and a cheerful of nearly 95 percent in Utah. Dr Michael Oppenheim, degradation president and chief medical communication officer for North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System in Great Neck, NY, said electronic record-keeping streamlines medical care.
More than two-thirds of kin doctors now use electronic well-being records, and the cut doing so doubled between 2005 and 2011, a young study finds. If the trend continues, 80 percent of one's own flesh and blood doctors - the largest group of primary concern physicians - will be using electronic records by 2013, the researchers predicted hoodiagordonii. The findings contribute "some encouragement that we have passed a depreciative threshold," said study author Dr Andrew Bazemore, superintendent of the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Primary Care, in Washington, DC "The significant preponderance of earliest care practitioners appear to be using digital medical records in some description or fashion".
The promises of electronic record-keeping include improved medical attention and long-term savings. However, many doctors were loth to adopt these records because of the high cost and the complexity of converting newspaper files. There were also privacy concerns. "We are not there yet," Bazemore added. "More employ is needed, including better message from all of the states".
The Obama administration has offered incentives to doctors who accept electronic health records, and penalties to those who do not. For the study, researchers mined two native data sets to survive how many family doctors were using electronic health records, how this platoon changed over time, and how it compared to use by specialists. Their findings appear in the January-February conclusion of the Annals of Family Medicine.
Nationally, 68 percent of household doctors were using electronic health records in 2011, they found. Rates heterogeneous by state, with a low of about 47 percent in North Dakota and a cheerful of nearly 95 percent in Utah. Dr Michael Oppenheim, degradation president and chief medical communication officer for North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System in Great Neck, NY, said electronic record-keeping streamlines medical care.
Friday, August 9, 2013
For Patients With Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Low Dose Steroid Tablets May Be Better Than Large Doses Of Injections
For Patients With Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Low Dose Steroid Tablets May Be Better Than Large Doses Of Injections.
Low-dose steroid pills seem to utilize as well as considerable doses of injected steroids for patients hospitalized with taxing long-standing obstructive pulmonary illness (COPD), researchers report. Yet, some 90 percent of these COPD patients are given the higher doses, which is reverse to accepted prescribing guidelines, claims the bookwork appearing in the June 16 result of the Journal of the American Medical Association wheretobuyrx. "We deep down think that doctors should be following hospital guidelines and treating patients with vocalized steroids, at least for those who are able to take oral steroids," said Dr Richard Mularski, founder of an accompanying leading article and a pulmonologist with Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research.
Mularski added that he was surprised that this many patients were receiving IV steroids. Patients in moment with COPD are routinely treated with corticosteroids, bronchodilators and antibiotics. Although it's absolve that steroids are compelling in treating COPD exacerbations, it's less lustrous which dose is preferable, stated the on authors.
The Massachusetts-based researchers looked at records on almost 80000 patients admitted with terminal symptoms of COPD to 414 US hospitals in 2006 and 2007. All had been given steroids within the maiden two days of their stay. The muse about did not allow for individuals who needed care in the intensive care unit. "These are patients that were heartsick enough to go into the hospital, but not sick enough to go into the ICU," said Dr Norman Edelman, greatest medical officer of the American Lung Association.
Low-dose steroid pills seem to utilize as well as considerable doses of injected steroids for patients hospitalized with taxing long-standing obstructive pulmonary illness (COPD), researchers report. Yet, some 90 percent of these COPD patients are given the higher doses, which is reverse to accepted prescribing guidelines, claims the bookwork appearing in the June 16 result of the Journal of the American Medical Association wheretobuyrx. "We deep down think that doctors should be following hospital guidelines and treating patients with vocalized steroids, at least for those who are able to take oral steroids," said Dr Richard Mularski, founder of an accompanying leading article and a pulmonologist with Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research.
Mularski added that he was surprised that this many patients were receiving IV steroids. Patients in moment with COPD are routinely treated with corticosteroids, bronchodilators and antibiotics. Although it's absolve that steroids are compelling in treating COPD exacerbations, it's less lustrous which dose is preferable, stated the on authors.
The Massachusetts-based researchers looked at records on almost 80000 patients admitted with terminal symptoms of COPD to 414 US hospitals in 2006 and 2007. All had been given steroids within the maiden two days of their stay. The muse about did not allow for individuals who needed care in the intensive care unit. "These are patients that were heartsick enough to go into the hospital, but not sick enough to go into the ICU," said Dr Norman Edelman, greatest medical officer of the American Lung Association.
Thursday, April 18, 2013
In Most Cases, A Cough Caused By Viruses, And Antibiotics To Treat It Impractical
In Most Cases, A Cough Caused By Viruses, And Antibiotics To Treat It Impractical.
You've been hacking and coughing for a week now - isn't it era that the cough was through? Sadly, the satisfy is often "no," and experts information that many kinsfolk have a incorrect idea of how long an exquisite cough should last. This misconception can lead to the surplus (and, for public safety, dangerous) overuse of antibiotics, a changed study finds where to buy rx. "No one wants or likes a lingering cough.
Patients merely want to get rid of it," said Dr Robert Graham, an internist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. "After wearing over-the-counter regimens for about a week, they seize their doctors with the hopes of obtaining a direction antibiotic for a self-limited modify that is usually caused by viruses," which do not respond to antibiotics, said Graham, who was not complex in the new study.
So how long does the average grave cough really last? The team of researchers from the University of Georgia, in Athens, reviewed medical information and found that the mediocre duration of an acute cough is nearly three weeks (17,8 days). They then surveyed nearly 500 adults and found that they reported that their cough lasted an common of seven to nine days. And if a unfaltering believes an crucial cough should last about a week, they are more likely to seek their doctor for antibiotics after five to six days of having a cough, the researchers noted.
You've been hacking and coughing for a week now - isn't it era that the cough was through? Sadly, the satisfy is often "no," and experts information that many kinsfolk have a incorrect idea of how long an exquisite cough should last. This misconception can lead to the surplus (and, for public safety, dangerous) overuse of antibiotics, a changed study finds where to buy rx. "No one wants or likes a lingering cough.
Patients merely want to get rid of it," said Dr Robert Graham, an internist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. "After wearing over-the-counter regimens for about a week, they seize their doctors with the hopes of obtaining a direction antibiotic for a self-limited modify that is usually caused by viruses," which do not respond to antibiotics, said Graham, who was not complex in the new study.
So how long does the average grave cough really last? The team of researchers from the University of Georgia, in Athens, reviewed medical information and found that the mediocre duration of an acute cough is nearly three weeks (17,8 days). They then surveyed nearly 500 adults and found that they reported that their cough lasted an common of seven to nine days. And if a unfaltering believes an crucial cough should last about a week, they are more likely to seek their doctor for antibiotics after five to six days of having a cough, the researchers noted.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)