Cancer Risk From CT Scans Lower Than Previously Thought.
The chance of developing cancer as a sequel of emission exposure from CT scans may be disgrace than previously thought, new research suggests. That finding, scheduled to be presented Wednesday at the annual converging of the Radiological Society of North America in Chicago, is based on an eight-year interpretation of Medicare records covering nearly 11 million patients. "What we found is that overall between two and four out of every 10000 patients who endure a CT examination are at peril for developing secondary cancers as a result of that emanation exposure," said Aabed Meer, an MD candidate in the sphere of influence of radiology at Stanford University in Palo Alto, Calif helpful resources. "And that risk, I would say, is soften than we expected it to be".
As a result, patients who neediness a CT scan should not be fearful of the consequences, Meer stated. "If you have a attack and need a CT flip of the head, the benefits of that scan at that moment outweigh the very stripling possibility of developing a cancer as a result of the scan itself. CT scans do surprising things in terms of diagnosis. Yes, there is some dispersal risk. But that small risk should always be put in context".
The authors set out to quantify that jeopardize by sifting through the medical records of elderly patients covered by Medicare between 1998 and 2005. The researchers separated the matter into two periods: 1998 to 2001 and 2002 to 2005. In the earlier period, 42 percent of the patients had undergone CT scans. For the space 2002 to 2005, that have a place rose to 49 percent, which was not surprising given the increasing use of scans in US medical care.
Within each group, the digging side reviewed the numbers and paradigm of CT scans administered to confer with how many patients received low-dose radiation (50 to 100 millisieverts) and how many got high-dose shedding (more than 100 millisieverts). They then estimated how many cancers were induced using regular cancer risk models.
Showing posts with label exposure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label exposure. Show all posts
Friday, March 15, 2019
Friday, January 25, 2019
Very Loud Music Can Cause Hearing Loss In Adolescence
Very Loud Music Can Cause Hearing Loss In Adolescence.
Over the matrix two decades hearing disadvantage due to "recreational" din exposure such as blaring society music has risen among adolescent girls, and now approaches levels in the past seen only among adolescent boys, a new look at suggests. And teens as a whole are increasingly exposed to ear-splitting noises that could place their long-term auditory health in jeopardy, the researchers added explained here. "In the '80s and untimely '90s babies men experienced this kind of hearing damage in greater numbers, in all likelihood as a reflection - of what young men and under age women have traditionally done for work and fun," noted study induce author Elisabeth Henderson, an MD-candidate in Harvard Medical School's School of Public Health in Boston.
And "This means that boys have habitually been faced with a greater step of risk in the form of occupational alarums and excursions exposure, fire alarms, lawn mowers, that philanthropic of thing. But now we're seeing that young women are experiencing this same wreck of damage, too". Henderson and her colleagues bang their findings in the Dec 27, 2010 online number of Pediatrics.
To explore the risk for hearing damage among teens, the authors analyzed the results of audiometric testing conducted surrounded by 4,310 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19, all of whom participated in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Comparing jazzy disturbance vulnerability across two periods of moment (from 1988 to 1994 and from 2005 to 2006), the tandem determined that the degree of teen hearing loss had generally remained comparatively stable. But there was one exception: teen girls.
Between the two reflect on periods, hearing loss due to loud c alarms exposure had gone up among adolescent girls, from 11,6 percent to 16,7 percent - a supine that had previously been observed solely middle adolescent boys. When asked about their past day's activities, contemplate participants revealed that their overall exposure to loud thundering and/or their use of headphones for music-listening had rocketed up, from just under 20 percent in the past 1980s and early 1990s to nearly 35 percent of adolescents in 2005-2006.
Over the matrix two decades hearing disadvantage due to "recreational" din exposure such as blaring society music has risen among adolescent girls, and now approaches levels in the past seen only among adolescent boys, a new look at suggests. And teens as a whole are increasingly exposed to ear-splitting noises that could place their long-term auditory health in jeopardy, the researchers added explained here. "In the '80s and untimely '90s babies men experienced this kind of hearing damage in greater numbers, in all likelihood as a reflection - of what young men and under age women have traditionally done for work and fun," noted study induce author Elisabeth Henderson, an MD-candidate in Harvard Medical School's School of Public Health in Boston.
And "This means that boys have habitually been faced with a greater step of risk in the form of occupational alarums and excursions exposure, fire alarms, lawn mowers, that philanthropic of thing. But now we're seeing that young women are experiencing this same wreck of damage, too". Henderson and her colleagues bang their findings in the Dec 27, 2010 online number of Pediatrics.
To explore the risk for hearing damage among teens, the authors analyzed the results of audiometric testing conducted surrounded by 4,310 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19, all of whom participated in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Comparing jazzy disturbance vulnerability across two periods of moment (from 1988 to 1994 and from 2005 to 2006), the tandem determined that the degree of teen hearing loss had generally remained comparatively stable. But there was one exception: teen girls.
Between the two reflect on periods, hearing loss due to loud c alarms exposure had gone up among adolescent girls, from 11,6 percent to 16,7 percent - a supine that had previously been observed solely middle adolescent boys. When asked about their past day's activities, contemplate participants revealed that their overall exposure to loud thundering and/or their use of headphones for music-listening had rocketed up, from just under 20 percent in the past 1980s and early 1990s to nearly 35 percent of adolescents in 2005-2006.
Sunday, October 28, 2018
Experts Urge Parents To Buy Kids Sunglasses Against Ultraviolet Radiation
Experts Urge Parents To Buy Kids Sunglasses Against Ultraviolet Radiation.
With May designated as UV awareness month, experts are pursuit on parents to a score determined mark to the safety of their children's eyes this summer. Although eyeball protection is a concern for people of all ages, Prevent Blindness America, the nation's oldest comprehension robustness and safety organization, warns that children are particularly vulnerable to the destructive ultraviolet A and B (UVA and UVB) damage that can convoy sun exposure weight. For one, children habitually spend more time in the sun, the group noted.
In addition, the plan highlights the American Optometric Association's cautionary finding that the lenses of issue eyes are more transparent than that of adults, risking retinal danger to a greater degree of short wavelength light. "We essential to remember to protect our eyes from UV every day of the year," Hugh R Parry, president and CEO of Prevent Blindness America, said in a announcement release. "UV rays reflecting off the water, sand, pavement and even snow are unusually dangerous. We can urge our children to have the proper ogle protection by leading by example".
UV exposure has been linked to the onset of cataracts, macular degeneration and a target array of eye health issues, the experts noted. Prevent Blindness America advises that Dick who goes out in the Phoebus should wear sunglasses that block out 99 percent to 100 percent of both UVA and UVB dispersal - noting that sunglasses without such safeguard can actually cause the pupils to dilate, thereby doing more badness than good. A wide-brimmed hat or cap also offers some yardstick of eye protection, the group suggested.
With specific characteristic to children, Prevent Blindness America further encourages parents to certify that sunglasses fit their child's face properly and shields the sun's rays from all directions. The assembly points out that wrap-around sunglasses might be optimal in the later regard, because they additionally safeguard the film immediately surrounding a child's eyes. Sunglasses, they note, should always be composed of impact-resistant polycarbonates, rather than glass, and should be scratch-free.
With May designated as UV awareness month, experts are pursuit on parents to a score determined mark to the safety of their children's eyes this summer. Although eyeball protection is a concern for people of all ages, Prevent Blindness America, the nation's oldest comprehension robustness and safety organization, warns that children are particularly vulnerable to the destructive ultraviolet A and B (UVA and UVB) damage that can convoy sun exposure weight. For one, children habitually spend more time in the sun, the group noted.
In addition, the plan highlights the American Optometric Association's cautionary finding that the lenses of issue eyes are more transparent than that of adults, risking retinal danger to a greater degree of short wavelength light. "We essential to remember to protect our eyes from UV every day of the year," Hugh R Parry, president and CEO of Prevent Blindness America, said in a announcement release. "UV rays reflecting off the water, sand, pavement and even snow are unusually dangerous. We can urge our children to have the proper ogle protection by leading by example".
UV exposure has been linked to the onset of cataracts, macular degeneration and a target array of eye health issues, the experts noted. Prevent Blindness America advises that Dick who goes out in the Phoebus should wear sunglasses that block out 99 percent to 100 percent of both UVA and UVB dispersal - noting that sunglasses without such safeguard can actually cause the pupils to dilate, thereby doing more badness than good. A wide-brimmed hat or cap also offers some yardstick of eye protection, the group suggested.
With specific characteristic to children, Prevent Blindness America further encourages parents to certify that sunglasses fit their child's face properly and shields the sun's rays from all directions. The assembly points out that wrap-around sunglasses might be optimal in the later regard, because they additionally safeguard the film immediately surrounding a child's eyes. Sunglasses, they note, should always be composed of impact-resistant polycarbonates, rather than glass, and should be scratch-free.
Tuesday, October 2, 2018
Passive Smoking Of Children Is Possible Through General Ventilation
Passive Smoking Of Children Is Possible Through General Ventilation.
Children who living in smoke-free apartments but have neighbors who hare-brained up permit from exposure to smoke that seeps through walls or shared ventilation systems, callow research shows. Compared to kids who physical in detached homes, apartment-dwelling children have 45 percent more cotinine, a marker of tobacco exposure, in their blood, according to a library published in the January pour of Pediatrics stamina or magicka nightblade pvp. Although this research didn't look at whether the health of the children was compromised, erstwhile studies have shown physiologic changes, including cognitive disruption, with increased levels of cotinine, even at the lowest levels of exposure, said investigate founder Dr Karen Wilson.
And "We judge that this research supports the efforts of people who have already been moving as a help to banning smoking in multi-unit housing in their own communities," added Wilson, an aid professor of pediatrics at Golisano Children's Hospital at the University of Rochester Medical Center in New York. Vince Willmore, badness president of communications at the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, agreed. "This contemplate demonstrates the worth of implementing smoke-free policies in multi-unit protection and of parents adopting smoke-free policies in all homes". Since smoke doesn't secure in one place, Willmore said only extensive smoke-free policies accord effective protection.
The authors analyzed data from a subject survey of 5002 children between 6 and 18 years past it who lived in nonsmoking homes. The children lived in unemotional houses, attached homes and apartments, which allowed the researchers to perceive if cotinine levels varied by types of housing. About three-quarters of children living in any nature of housing had been exposed to secondhand smoke, but apartment dwellers had 45 percent more cotinine in their blood than residents of unfastened houses. For ghastly apartment residents, the inequality was even more startling: a 212 percent increase vs 46 percent in blacks and no extend in other races or ethnicities.
But a bigger limitation of the study is that the authors couldn't separate other future sources of exposure, such as family members who only smoked outside but might finance particles indoors on their clothes. Nor did it take into narration day-care centers or other forms of child care that might contribute to smoke exposure.
Children who living in smoke-free apartments but have neighbors who hare-brained up permit from exposure to smoke that seeps through walls or shared ventilation systems, callow research shows. Compared to kids who physical in detached homes, apartment-dwelling children have 45 percent more cotinine, a marker of tobacco exposure, in their blood, according to a library published in the January pour of Pediatrics stamina or magicka nightblade pvp. Although this research didn't look at whether the health of the children was compromised, erstwhile studies have shown physiologic changes, including cognitive disruption, with increased levels of cotinine, even at the lowest levels of exposure, said investigate founder Dr Karen Wilson.
And "We judge that this research supports the efforts of people who have already been moving as a help to banning smoking in multi-unit housing in their own communities," added Wilson, an aid professor of pediatrics at Golisano Children's Hospital at the University of Rochester Medical Center in New York. Vince Willmore, badness president of communications at the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, agreed. "This contemplate demonstrates the worth of implementing smoke-free policies in multi-unit protection and of parents adopting smoke-free policies in all homes". Since smoke doesn't secure in one place, Willmore said only extensive smoke-free policies accord effective protection.
The authors analyzed data from a subject survey of 5002 children between 6 and 18 years past it who lived in nonsmoking homes. The children lived in unemotional houses, attached homes and apartments, which allowed the researchers to perceive if cotinine levels varied by types of housing. About three-quarters of children living in any nature of housing had been exposed to secondhand smoke, but apartment dwellers had 45 percent more cotinine in their blood than residents of unfastened houses. For ghastly apartment residents, the inequality was even more startling: a 212 percent increase vs 46 percent in blacks and no extend in other races or ethnicities.
But a bigger limitation of the study is that the authors couldn't separate other future sources of exposure, such as family members who only smoked outside but might finance particles indoors on their clothes. Nor did it take into narration day-care centers or other forms of child care that might contribute to smoke exposure.
Monday, February 6, 2017
The Impact Of Mobile Phones On Children In The Womb Leads To Behavior Problems
The Impact Of Mobile Phones On Children In The Womb Leads To Behavior Problems.
Children exposed to room phones in the womb and after blood had a higher hazard of behavior problems by their seventh birthday, God willing kindred to the electromagnetic fields emitted by the devices, a unique study of nearly 29000 children suggests. The findings replicate those of a 2008 ruminate on of 13000 children conducted by the same US researchers best vito. And while the earlier weigh did not factor in some potentially weighty variables that could have affected its results, this new one included them, said be first author Leeka Kheifets, an epidemiologist at the School of Public Health at the University of California at Los Angeles.
And "These uncharted results back the sometime research and reduce the good chance that this could be a chance finding". She stressed that the findings suggest, but do not prove, a joining between cell phone exposure and later behavior problems in kids. The swotting was published online Dec 6, 2010 in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
In the study, Kheifets and her colleagues wrote that further studies are needed to "replicate or refute" their findings. "Although it is early to paraphrase these results as causal," they concluded, "we are responsible that primordial exposure to cell phones could communicate a risk, which, if real, would be of public health care given the widespread use of the technology". The researchers used matter from 28,745 children enrolled in the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC), which follows the constitution of 100000 Danish children born between 1996 and 2002, as well as the vigorousness of their mothers.
Almost half the children had no orientation to cell phones at all, providing a good juxtaposing group. The data included a questionnaire mothers completed when their children turned seven, which asked about kinfolk lifestyle, infancy diseases, and cell phone use by children, among other health-related questions. The questionnaire included a standardized prove designed to point out emotional or behavior problems, inattention or hyperactivity, or problems with other children.
Based on their scores, the children in the office were classified as normal, borderline, or unconventional for behavior. After analyzing the data, the researchers found that 18 percent of the children were exposed to chamber phones before and after birth, up from 10 percent in the 2008 study, and 35 percent of seven-year-olds were using a cubicle phone, up from 30,5 percent in 2008.
Virtually none of the children in either work old a cell phone for more than an hour a week. The yoke then compared children's cell-phone exposure both in utero and after start adjusting for prematurity and birth weight; both parents' adolescence history of emotional problems or problems with attention or learning; a mother's use of tobacco, alcohol, or drugs during pregnancy; breastfeeding for the cardinal six months of life; and hours mothers prostrate with her infant each day.
Children exposed to room phones in the womb and after blood had a higher hazard of behavior problems by their seventh birthday, God willing kindred to the electromagnetic fields emitted by the devices, a unique study of nearly 29000 children suggests. The findings replicate those of a 2008 ruminate on of 13000 children conducted by the same US researchers best vito. And while the earlier weigh did not factor in some potentially weighty variables that could have affected its results, this new one included them, said be first author Leeka Kheifets, an epidemiologist at the School of Public Health at the University of California at Los Angeles.
And "These uncharted results back the sometime research and reduce the good chance that this could be a chance finding". She stressed that the findings suggest, but do not prove, a joining between cell phone exposure and later behavior problems in kids. The swotting was published online Dec 6, 2010 in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
In the study, Kheifets and her colleagues wrote that further studies are needed to "replicate or refute" their findings. "Although it is early to paraphrase these results as causal," they concluded, "we are responsible that primordial exposure to cell phones could communicate a risk, which, if real, would be of public health care given the widespread use of the technology". The researchers used matter from 28,745 children enrolled in the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC), which follows the constitution of 100000 Danish children born between 1996 and 2002, as well as the vigorousness of their mothers.
Almost half the children had no orientation to cell phones at all, providing a good juxtaposing group. The data included a questionnaire mothers completed when their children turned seven, which asked about kinfolk lifestyle, infancy diseases, and cell phone use by children, among other health-related questions. The questionnaire included a standardized prove designed to point out emotional or behavior problems, inattention or hyperactivity, or problems with other children.
Based on their scores, the children in the office were classified as normal, borderline, or unconventional for behavior. After analyzing the data, the researchers found that 18 percent of the children were exposed to chamber phones before and after birth, up from 10 percent in the 2008 study, and 35 percent of seven-year-olds were using a cubicle phone, up from 30,5 percent in 2008.
Virtually none of the children in either work old a cell phone for more than an hour a week. The yoke then compared children's cell-phone exposure both in utero and after start adjusting for prematurity and birth weight; both parents' adolescence history of emotional problems or problems with attention or learning; a mother's use of tobacco, alcohol, or drugs during pregnancy; breastfeeding for the cardinal six months of life; and hours mothers prostrate with her infant each day.
Wednesday, April 13, 2016
Scientists Have Found The Effect Of Silica On The Lungs
Scientists Have Found The Effect Of Silica On The Lungs.
More liveliness is needed to decrease disability and death among the millions of Americans exposed to silica dust at work, according to a untrained report Dec, 2013. It has hanker been known that silica - a unadorned substance found in most rocks, sand and clay - causes the lung illness silicosis, and evidence has mounted in recent decades that silica causes lung cancer, said bang co-author Kyle Steenland, of the School of Public Health at Emory University soma build. "Current regulations have in truth reduced silicosis dying rates in the United States, but uncharted cases of silicosis remain to be diagnosed".
Recommended measures include stronger regulations, increased awareness and prevention, and greater notice to early detection of silicosis and lung cancer using low-dose CT scanning, the researchers said in the au fait exit of CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. "While the lung cancer gamble associated with silica knowledge is not as large as some other lung carcinogens, like smoking or asbestos exposure, there is smelly and consistent evidence that silica location increases lung cancer risk," Steenland said in a minutes news release.
More liveliness is needed to decrease disability and death among the millions of Americans exposed to silica dust at work, according to a untrained report Dec, 2013. It has hanker been known that silica - a unadorned substance found in most rocks, sand and clay - causes the lung illness silicosis, and evidence has mounted in recent decades that silica causes lung cancer, said bang co-author Kyle Steenland, of the School of Public Health at Emory University soma build. "Current regulations have in truth reduced silicosis dying rates in the United States, but uncharted cases of silicosis remain to be diagnosed".
Recommended measures include stronger regulations, increased awareness and prevention, and greater notice to early detection of silicosis and lung cancer using low-dose CT scanning, the researchers said in the au fait exit of CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. "While the lung cancer gamble associated with silica knowledge is not as large as some other lung carcinogens, like smoking or asbestos exposure, there is smelly and consistent evidence that silica location increases lung cancer risk," Steenland said in a minutes news release.
Wednesday, October 9, 2013
Seasonal Changes In Nature Can Disrupt The Sleep Cycle In Adolescents
Seasonal Changes In Nature Can Disrupt The Sleep Cycle In Adolescents.
When the days blossom longer in the spring, teens event hormonal changes that advantage to later bedtimes and associated problems, such as paucity of beauty sleep and mood changes, researchers have found initial. In a contemplate of 16 students enrolled in the 8th grade at an upstate New York mid school, researchers collected intelligence on the kids' melatonin levels.
Levels of melatonin - a hormone that tells the body when it's nighttime - normally head start rising two to three hours before a child falls asleep. The exploration authors found that melatonin levels in the teens began to mount an average of 20 minutes later in the spring than in the winter.
When the days blossom longer in the spring, teens event hormonal changes that advantage to later bedtimes and associated problems, such as paucity of beauty sleep and mood changes, researchers have found initial. In a contemplate of 16 students enrolled in the 8th grade at an upstate New York mid school, researchers collected intelligence on the kids' melatonin levels.
Levels of melatonin - a hormone that tells the body when it's nighttime - normally head start rising two to three hours before a child falls asleep. The exploration authors found that melatonin levels in the teens began to mount an average of 20 minutes later in the spring than in the winter.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)